Uncategorized

THE CHECK IS IN THE MAIL

Republican Matt Van Epps will end up winning the special election in Tennessee’s 7th Congressional District by about 9 percentage points.

That might sound like a solid win. Except that Tennessee-7 is a solidly Republican district. Both Donald Trump and the representative whose resignation triggered the election carried the 7th by more than 20 percentage points.

Some polls close to the vote indicated that the Democrat, Aftyn Behn, was within 3 points of Van Epps. So those of you who read that – and little else – might believe that she didn’t do well.

Baloney. Behn took a cue from Zohran Mamdani in New York and ran on the affordability issue. It helped her wipe out more than half the usual margin in the district.

A district, I might add, that was totally rigged against her.

—-

I don’t remember Ken Burns’ outstanding “The American Revolution” series mentioning Founding Father Elbridge Gerry. He merely signed the Declaration of Independence and then helped supply the Patriot armies.

Unfortunately, in his old age, he became a staunch partisan. As governor of Massachusetts, he approved legislative boundaries that showed favoritism to his Democratic-Republican Party, leading to the term “gerrymandering.”

So Gerry figures prominently in the politics of the nation he helped create more than two centuries later.

Because Tennessee – once home to such noted Democrats as Estes Kefauver and the Gore family – is now a solid red state. And the reactionaries who funded the long game that is Republican politics have ensured the party’s success by making it almost impossible for Democrats to win Congressional seats. Thank you, Mr. Gerry.

So Behn’s 9-point loss, while not a win for the Democrats, is likely to make Republicans very nervous. If the Democrats wipe 12 points off Republican margins around the country next year, the House will almost certainly flip – and the Senate might as well.

That’s why you’re seeing all this nonsense with creating more Republican districts in states like Texas, Indiana and Missouri – and why California countered with Prop. 50, Gavin Newsome’s so-far successful effort to bolster Democrats.

As a believer in democracy, I think gerrymandering sucks. As President Obama often says, voters should pick legislators and not the other way around.

But unilateral disarmament is a problem. So, yeah, while it goes against my core belief, I think New York, Virginia and Illinois need to join California in reshaping legislative maps. I’ve given up on the idea of expecting Republicans to ever do what’s right.

Gerrymandering isn’t the only way the Republicans will try to hold onto power. They might also plan to give you money.

I think that sometime before November 3, 2026, the Republicans will try to buy your love with something they’ll call a tariff dividend – the money collected by tacking these ridiculous surcharges onto things we buy from countries that don’t kiss Trump’s butt.

Maybe it will be about $2,000. It will be a check and the biggest letters on it won’t be your name. They will be PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP.

If you don’t throw it out thinking it’s a campaign mailing, make sure you cash it. But don’t, for a moment, think that you’re coming out ahead.

The tariffs and the inflation they’ve triggered have already cost you way more than whatever amount these putzes are going to send you.

Unfortunately, it will work somewhat. In 2024, many voters remembered those checks aimed at stemming economic disaster during COVID – checked they thought originated with Trump because he insisted that his name be put on them, even though the idea came from Democrats in the House.

You always think fondly of people who give you money. I wish I could say I’m going to take the money and put it toward an organization whose mission has suffered from the devastation Trump and his sycophants have wreaked on our country. 

But, like you, I’m going to be hurting financially. I’m a senior citizen, living on a fixed income. So I’ll cash the check. And I won’t forget why I’m in the spot I’ll be in.

I thank Aftyn Behn for running a strong, positive campaign. Some of the ideas she offered might not have been well received by Tennesseans a year ago. But now, with the real economy faltering and our country becoming a hermit, they got a fair hearing from those not completely swallowed up by MAGAdumb.

Maybe, in November, no amount of Republican connivance can change what will happen. That won’t be easy to achieve.

Standard
Uncategorized

HOLIDAY SONG COUNTDOWN: HARK! THE HERALD ANGELS SING – 22 DAYS UNTIL CHRISTMAS

“Hark! the Herald Angels Sing” reverses a trend we’ve seen in these holiday songs. The lyrics we use today were written by a Methodist leader in the 1750s, adapting the form that a fellow minister composed about 20 years later.

But the melody came about a century later, when a cantana composed by Felix Mendelssohn was put to the existing lyrics.

It’s not a bad song. But I think we love it because it’s what’s playing when George Bailey finds out he’s actually the richest man in Bedford Falls and when the Peanuts gang realizes Charlie Brown picked out the perfect tree. It carries emotional weight in the holiday season.

The version I’ve picked for today is one introduced to me by my brother several years ago. It’s performed by a group called Cuba/L.A., an ensemble that sought to popularize Afro-Cuban music in the 1990s and 2000s.

Playing this version never fails to stir me. Hee haw and I hope you enjoy it.

Standard
Uncategorized

HOLIDAY SONG COUNTDOWN: HAPPY XMAS (WAR IS OVER) – 23 DAYS UNTIL CHRISTMAS

This song came out of nowhere in the holiday season of 1971.

It was recorded in October and released a few weeks before Christmas. We all knew that John and Yoko were on a peace-and-love mission, but this expressed it in holiday form.

“Happy Xmas (War Is Over)” certainly feels like a song of its time – a protest against the Vietnam War, which Nixon was dragging out to make it seem he was a peacemaker by the ’72 election.

But it also hasn’t dated. Its message remains strong today – think Venezuela, Ukraine and Gaza instead of Vietnam. And it counters the message of a warmongering White House run by a insecure lout.

It’s also good music. The melody is catchy and memorable.

To prove the point, instead of the original, here’s an instrumental version by cellist Yo-Yo Ma and ukelele player Jake Shimabukuro.

https://music.youtube.com/watch?v=A-h6V8J9ARE

Standard
Uncategorized

HOLIDAY SONG COUNTDOWN: GROOVY XMAS – 24 DAYS UNTIL CHRISTMAS

I’m not sure how this septagenarian found this Christmas song by a Los Angeles-area band who’s youngest member turned 15 in August.

But I think it’s terrific. It’s uptempo and joyful.

It is filled with conteporary culture references, and pays homage to “A Charlie Brown Christmas,” “How the Grinch Stole Christmas” and Mariah Carey. 

And it’s a reminder that Christmas is for kids from 1 to 92 – even if they’re actually, well, kids.

It’s worth a listen. You can always tell these girls to get off your lawn on December 26.

https://music.youtube.com/watch?v=edJeYaXPbYI

Standard
Uncategorized

HOLIDAY SONG COUNTDOWN: GREENSLEEVES (WHAT CHILD IS THIS) – 25 DAYS UNTIL CHRISTMAS

Back in the 19th century, it seems like they recycled melodies a lot.

“The Star-Spangled Banner” and “Deck the Halls” are two examples of music that was composed before the 1800s and lyrics crafted to fit those melodies.

Such is true of “Greensleeves,” although there’s a slight difference.

The melody is believed to date back to Britain in 1580 – when Shakespeare was a teenager. It has been used for folk tunes, love songs, operatic arias and what the ice cream truck plays as it rolls down the street. 

In 1865, William Chatterton Dix took the tune and put Christmas-themed words to it. It was given the alternate title of “What Child Is This?” and apparently caught on.

The best arrangement is the Vince Guaraldi interpretation that is part of the epic “A Charlie Brown Christmas” soundtrack. But the version I’m linking to is that of a great singer who passed in 2025: Roberta Flack. I hope you enjoy it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_ilAT57Jpc

Standard
Uncategorized

HOLIDAY SONG COUNTDOWN: GOOD KING WENCESLAS – 26 DAYS UNTIL CHRISTMAS

You’ve probably been listening to this song your entire life and not understood a) why it’s a Christmas song and b) who the heck King Wenceslas was and what kingdom did he rule.

Let’s start with second things first.

First of all, Wenceslaus I wasn’t a king. He was a duke of Bohemia (now Czechia), the equivalent of a prince. He lived in the 900s – he might be the best known person of the 10th century by default.

Most of what we know about him is legend – there aren’t a whole lot of documents remaining from 1,100 years ago. But apparently, as the song indicates, he went around providing comfort for the impoverished in his realm.

Wenceslaus was supposedly murdered by his younger brother, whose name – believe it or not – was Boleslaus the Cruel. They didn’t fool around with names back then.

Later in the 9th century, the Holy Roman Emperor posthumously crowned Wenceslaus, who also was made a saint by the Catholic Church.

As for the song, the feast of Stephen is the second of the 12 days of Christmas, a day honoring  one of the first Christian martyrs, 

The Wenceslaus legend hung around throughout the centuries. In the 1850s, a British hymn writer put lyrics to a 13th century melody, dropped the u from his name, and, voila, “Good King Wenceslas.”

It’s not one of my favorite holiday songs and I can’t name a definitive version. So here is a version I found on YouTube by the Irish Rovers. 

Standard
Uncategorized

HOLIDAY MUSIC COUNTDOWN: DECK THE HALLS – 27 DAYS UNTIL CHRISTMAS

I love music of the holiday season. Obsessively.

I add about 100 songs to my library every year. I possess some of the best songs that you might never have heard, some unusual versions of songs you know and some recordings that you would loathe me for bringing into your life.

So I’ll start this year’s countdown to Christmas Day with one of the best-known songs of the season.

“Deck the Halls” started its existence with a Welsh melody that was written more than 400 years ago. In the 1860s, Scottish musician Thomas Oliphant put Christmas words to the melody, which had been used to celebrate the New Year.

Oliphant’s original first stanza remains intact – with the exception of one line. His original third line was “Fill the meadcup, drain the barrel.”

That apparently didn’t sit well with folks in Pennsylvania. If kids were going to sing this song, filling meadcups and draining barrels wouldn’t do. So they changed the lyrics.

To “Don we now our gay apparel.”

In 1877, “gay” was not widely used the way we use it in 2025. Had the Pennsylvanians realized how the meaning of the word would change, it’s a good bet they would have come up with something else.

In fact, I’m surprised the people who see gay as some sort of evil haven’t tried to change the lyrics. Even back to the mead and the barrel draining.

I didn’t use any lyrics when I did my reimagining of the song in 2023. I fooled around a little with the melody instead and created something I thought was more contemporary.

It’s one of three tracks on my holiday EP, “Holiday Hospitality,” which you can hear on pretty much every streaming service (Spotify, Apple Music, etc.) and buy digitally on Amazon and iTunes.

Here is the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HXYDm6kDsK0&list=RDHXYDm6kDsK0&start_radio=1 from YouTube Music. I hope you enjoy it, in gay apparel, a full meadcup, or both.

Standard
Uncategorized

HOW WELL WE’RE DOING

Christmas is a holiday for kids. Thanksgiving is for older people.

People my age aren’t bursting with excitement about what we think will be under the tree in four weeks. We have everything. Seriously. And if by some chance we don’t have it, we’ll go out and buy it ourselves.

But Thanksgiving isn’t about – or isn’t supposed to be – about what we’re getting. Other than what’s probably the best meal most of us will eat in 2025. 

Thanksgiving is about sitting at a table with other members of your family. For those who aren’t quite as old as I am, that could mean a lot of difficult political discussion. If that’s the case in your celebration, my condolences.

But for the family matriarch and patriarch, the gathering together is a moment of recognition. You look at the people seated around your table, from your oldest child to youngest family member, and think about what you’ve accomplished in life.

I look on in awe. We have no grandchildren – yet, anyway. But we have two adult kids, my daughter is married and my son is romantically involved. And sitting and watching the best people I know tell stories, jokes, kid each other, complain about something, comment on the food is the best thing I can imagine.

When I watch it, I think of my wife’s father and my father.

My wife’s dad was a really hard-working man who was quiet and serious. Except on a holiday like Thanksgiving. Then he would sit in the family living room, watch his grandchildren running around – and smile the entire day. It was a time in his life when he thought that maybe, just maybe, all he endured in the past – and there was a lot – was worth it.

Because Thanksgiving Day itself was so crazy, we didn’t spend the holiday with my parents. What we did was have an early Thanksgiving two weeks before that made it easier for those traveling a distance – that was most of us – to get there.

At the end, my father would want a family picture. We’d sit around the dining room table and just before the camera clicked atop the tripod, Dad would place a bottle of wine consumed during dinner because, in his words, he wanted “everyone to see how well he’s doing.”

I didn’t think much of Thanksgiving until the past few years, in retirement. When I was working at CNN, the day after was the big shopping scramble of Black Friday,. We started covering stuff around midnight and into the early hours of the day. So I couldn’t really unwind and enjoy Thanksgiving Day knowing I had to be up at around 3 a.m. to get to Manhattan.

Now that I don’t care if Walmart opens at 4 a.m., 5 a.m. or ever, Thanksgiving means more, It’s a great chance to reflect on the joy my family brings me every day. I’m not a religious person, but there is a sense of gratitude that this is how my life has unfolded.

I hope you feel the same way today. There are people who don’t – and this might very well be a sad or painful day for them. I can’t imagine any family with a member in custody after ICE grabbed them cares a whit for turkey or the Macy’s parade balloons. There are folks struggling economically, or in a bad way physically, and we should think of them this day.

I think what Thanksgiving means the 72nd time is that there is much to appreciate about this life and we should celebrate it. And that it isn’t a competition – working to make others feel as fortunate as we are should be a given, today and everyday.

Happy Thanksgiving to you and all who you love!

Standard
Uncategorized

WHO TELLS YOUR STORY

In early 2015, soon after I retired, my hip-to-the-world daughter told me how excited she was about seeing a new production. 

To be fair, she always seems to be excited about new productions. In part, because, well, she’s an aspiring playwright and TV writer. 

But once she gets excited about an idea, she’s not going to let it go.

In that case, it was the oddity of taking Ron Chernow’s biography of Alexander Hamilton and turning it into a musical – OK, right there that’s a little weird – featuring a multiracial cast and rapping – which puts it in another zone of strange.

Well, more than a few of you have seen the musical, “Hamilton,” either on stage or on the taped version of it that runs of Disney+. 

But it took me more than 10 years to finally see it in person. Appropriately, with my daughter, who saw it for the third time and still found moments that moved her to tears.

You might have enjoyed watching “Hamilton” in the comfort of your home. But theater is meant to be seen live, in person. Because you can’t get the full impact of Lin-Manuel Miranda’s masterpiece unless your living it, in the moment, with as talented a bunch of performers as you can imagine.

It’s watching it unfold, as if it is something you’re living through in the moment, to make you realize that you are actually living through it even after the three hours you spend in the room where it happens.

Like so many theatrical and cinematic portrayals of history, “Hamilton” takes liberties with the true story – and not just the fact that Hamilton wasn’t Hispanic and Aaron Burr wasn’t black. If your kid sees the show prior to taking an American History quiz on the Revolution, there’s a chance he or she might get some things wrong.

That doesn’t affect the power of what you see. Or the fact that “Hamilton” is an essential way – particularly now – to convey some important concepts.

First, it’s often said that history is written by the winners. Those of us who think this period of history will go down as a dark mark assume we will eventually triumph over the forces arrayed against us.

That might not happen. Maybe Steven Miller doesn’t melt when you throw a bucket on water on him.

In the case of Hamilton, he lost the duel with Burr. But Burr wasn’t all that popular to begin with – that’s probably how things escalated to the point of pistols in Weehawken. So if, as the musical portrays, Elizabeth Hamilton tried to protect her husband’s reputation after his death, it wasn’t without help from the powers that were, including his long-time political foe, Thomas Jefferson.

Second, while I loved history as a kid, it seems that it’s among the least popular subjects for younger people.

To its credit, “Hamilton” is drawing a young audience – the crowd I was with had lots of students and their enthusiasm seemed to further inspire the cast. 

Miranda said he cast the musical the way he did because reflecting our nation’s current demography made it more relevant. In my eyes, and after seeing the show, he’s not wrong.

The actor who played George Washington, Tamar Greene, is a very tall Black man who looks nothing like Gilbert Stuart’s portrait of the Father of Our Country. It doesn’t matter – no actor I’ve seen captures the spirit of Washington as much as Greene did last night.

And that leads me to my third point: the saddest part of this show to me is when Washington tells Hamilton he will not seek a third term as president. That the country is bigger than one man, even one who is the pivotal figure in its very existence.

That doesn’t sound like 2025. I’d bet that if Trump saw the show, assuming he understood what was going on, that the whole idea of doing something for the good of the nation would be completely lost on him. 

Greene made me feel all that. His passion and complex emotions – determination to do the right thing, anguish at leaving something he clearly enjoys – shine through. When I was over, I wished Greene was president instead of this cluck.

Of course, the point Miranda wanted to make was about immigration. Hamilton came to what became the United States from the West Indies. He was an orphan and felt he had to work harder to achieve anything.

That’s a constant theme in the musical. And I’m not sure it resonates as well on TV as it does in the confines of a theater on West 46th Street in Manhattan – outside which could very well be the 21st-century Gestapo called ICE looking to snatch 21st-century Hamiltons off the streets,

It’s a reminder – as if we needed it – that this is a country of immigrants, more so than any other nation in the world. It is our superpower, the roux in our gravy, the pulse of our pulmonary system.

The idiots who think immigration is weakness have no idea what makes America great. And I while I reveled in what I saw on stage, MAGA types would watch “Hamilton” and merely see ensemble performers in tight pants and guys in dopey costumes.

It took me 10 years to see “Hamilton” live. It didn’t change my view about anything except to reinforce what I already felt about what I saw on stage. And how I so wish everyone in America could see what I see in the power of this musical.

Maybe I’ll get my daughter to work on them.

Standard
Uncategorized

THE WOMEN WHO REPORT

The 21st century is just about one-quarter over. And, in my mind, it’s a slam dunk as to what’s the most consequential piece of journalism of the last 25 years.

It’s the 2018 “Pervasion of Justice” series in the Miami Herald. The reporter was Julie K. Brown, and what she detailed – and detailed should be underlined and bolded there – was the sex trafficking ring maintained for the wealthy and powerful by financier Jeffrey Epstein.

In the series, Brown interviewed about 80 victims of Epstein, some who were as young as 13 when they were exploited. Those victims never knew the terms of Epstein’s two state charge convictions or that he made a deal that canceled federal charges. 

The stories also detailed how Epstein’s “incarceration” included frequent home visits and trips to New York and his Caribbean retreat.

Brown’s work led to new charges against Epstein in 2019 – charges that were pending when Epstein died in his New York jail cell, supposedly by his own hand.

Here it is, 2025, and we’re still amidst the reprecussions of Brown’s reporting. Largely because one of Epstein’s most prominent associates, Donald Trump, was president at the time of the publication and somehow managed to get elected again last year.

Brown is the Woodward and Bernstein of this generation. She should have a Pulitzer Prize to show for the incredible work she did.

That she doesn’t is possibly due to the machinations of attorney Alan Dershowitz, who knew Epstein and was implicated in Brown’s reporting. He complained loudly and publicly, and lobbied the Pulitzer committee against awarding Brown for her work.

When I started my career, there were few women in newsrooms. When I retired, more than half the people in my newsroom were female.

That is a remarkable change and there’s only one reason for it. And it’s not because of affirmative action, DEI, wokeness or anything else detractors conjure.

The reason is that the women who go into journalism are very good at journalism.

It has been my privilege to work with, work for and to mentor women of exceptional talent. They put in the time, they put up with the frustrations, they deal with the vagaries of corporate capriciousness. Like all journalists, they don’t get paid as well as other professionals – and too many of them still don’t get paid as much as their male counterparts.

They also have to contend with a lot of crap. Which brings us to this week.

I once aspired to be a White House correspondent – that what’s I thought was the ultimate job in journalism. That viewpoint changed as I saw other uses for my abilities – and I saw the way people who cover the president never seem to stop working.

So when two women covering the mishegas known as Trump dared to ask questions that he didn’t want to answer, he lashed out in a way you kind of expect from a low-life grifter.

When a reporter for Bloomberg News asked why he didn’t just release the Epstein files instead of having Congress vote to subpoena them, he told her “Quiet, quiet piggy.” Implying that a woman looking for a simple answer was less than human.

When a reporter for ABC News confronted Trump about welcoming Mohammed bin Salman – the Saudi leader who allegedly masterminded the murder of a Washington Post journalist – he went into a diatribe against her and urged the FCC to take away the network’s broadcast license.

Bloomberg’s Catherine Lucey and ABC’s Mary Bruce stood firm against an abusive old fart. Hopefully, their employers will have their back. They join a long line of female journalists – April Ryan and Abby Phillips, among others – who’ve had their professionalism and integrity challenged by someone with none of either.

What a lot of people are wondering is why other White House reporters, particularly male counterparts, didn’t come to the defense of Lucey and Bruce.

One reason is that a president’s feeble attempt to humiliate a reporter is not in the J-school playbook. If you want to know how far Trump is from what considered acceptable behavior from anyone in public life, think of any other president in our lifetime who would talk to a female reporter in that manner. Not even Richard Nixon – the standard for miserable presidents until now – would do that.

But there’s also the problem of fear. Other journalists aren’t brave enough to risk Trump’s wrath.

And there’s also the problem of sycophancy. This White House has brought more of those who suck up to Trump into the ranks of supposedly objective journalists

— 

So to Julie Brown and Catherine Lucey and Mary Bruce and all the American women working in newsrooms around the world, thanks for making journalism so much better. 

When you think about what makes America great, they should be among the first thoughts.

Standard