Until last night, Graham Platner was the Democratic candidate for the Maine U.S. Senate seat now held by Susan Collins.
He won the party primary with a populist campaign that resonated with Down Easters (am I allowed to write that if I’m a New Yorker who’s visited Maine twice?). Among his stances are supporting a woman’s right to an abortion, getting big money out of politics and bolstering the state’s struggling business – including fishing, which is what he does.
But Platner had issues from the start. He reportedly hasn’t been the most loyal husband. He has been accused of sexual misconduct with women he dated. He supposedly had a tattoo on his chest that was a Nazi symbol, something he has since covered up.
On the other hand, Democrats – both in Maine and around the nation – desperately want to win this race. This is one of the more flippable Senate seats in a year in which Democrats don’t have lots of opportunities.
And Collins, the incumbent, is especially vexing. Most prominently, she cast a decisive vote for Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh after saying she was assured that Kavanaugh believed Roe v. Wade was established law. Which, thanks to Kavanaugh’s vote on the Dobbs case, wasn’t true.
So the Democrats wanted the strongest possible candidate for the Maine seat. And Platner seized the opportunity, running a more responsive campaign for the seat than his primary opponent, Gov. Janet Mills. If they’re still online, watch a Platner campaign appearance if you want to see someone who knows how to talk to angry voters.
Not to mention – and this is important to keep in mind – Platner is about half as old as the octogenarian Mills. He trounced her in the primary last month.
But now, with new accusations of sexual misconduct, Platner bowed out. He didn’t have much choice. Prominent Democrats who supported him – including Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren – rescinded their endorsements. The state party needed an answer quickly so that it could legally put up another candidate.
Of course, there’s a lot of hand-wringing about all this. It’s the old “everybody should have known” routine – once a few accusations surfaced, Platner’s candidacy should have been doomed.
But it wasn’t. Not until the latest accusations, whose credibility seems to be strong, did people wonder why Platner got this opportunity.
The answer to that is seven paragraphs up.
Democrats – and a lot of independents and non-MAGA Republicans – feel an incredible urgency about this midterm election. It might be the last chance this nation to save itself from a Trump dictatorship. To save itself from decades of retrogression on civil rights, women’s rights, LGBTQ rights, health security, climate change and immigration reform.
A Democratic Senate won’t approve Trump’s nominees for judicial and executive positions – men and women who have formed a kakistocracy unimaginable even in the first term. It can join a Democratic House in investigating a presidential family that has made more than $1 billion profiting from office.
Platner sounded like a winner. He had a common sense wisdom and a terrific stump style. It’s not hard to imagine that if Collins chose to debate him – and my guess is she wouldn’t – he would have made her look dotty and out of touch.
Now, as Democrats ponder what to do next, they’re facing questions about why they let this happen to them. Why didn’t they come up with somebody more ethical than Platner?
For starters, very few people have perfect pasts, Think about what you wouldn’t want people to find out about you if you chose to run for office. Whether it’s an old relationship, a bad job experience, an encounter with the law.
And it costs money. A lot of money. Maine is not a big media state. Portland, which includes the 11 counties surrounding it, is the 78th largest media market in the country.
And yet, thanks to the Super PAC money that will flow like 100 Poland Springs, the cost of this campaign could be around $400 million, according to AdImpact. That’s just a chunk of the $11 billion that will be spent on the midterms between now and November.
So Democrats feel a lot of pressure to win. And the polling and sentiment seemed to be that Platner had a better chance to beat Collins than anyone else who tried or was even thought to be a candidate.
We’ll find out in the next few weeks how this will turn out,
But the Maine race is just one part of the problem for Democrats. In Michigan, a Muslim candidate with strongly progressive views had been leading the race for the Senate nomination. But one of the two more moderate candidates dropped out, and the race is now a toss-up.
That’s happening in lots of Senate and House races around the country. Democrats are so intent on stopping Donald Trump that all they want is the best chance to win.
The problem is that Democrats on who that should be. Should we find the least objectionable candidate in an effort to try to sway what few fence-sitters there are left in the electorate?
Or should we vote our hearts? Should we double down on ideology and support people who are not part of the Democratic political establishment? By infusing the election with new blood, with guys like Platner and Abdul El-Sayed in Michigan, will Democrats lure voters who are frustrated with the status quo and juice the turnout?
There’s also the age thing. Democrats already see what going younger can mean – 34-year-old Zohran Mamdani is wildly popular in New York because none of us have seen a mayor with this much energy and commitment to do good things.
What if there are hundreds of Mamdanis in this country, ready to help Democrats rebuild from the rubble of Trump?
There’s no easy way out. But we can’t back down. Hopefully, Maine Democrats will figure out the right thing to do.