Uncategorized

THE SIXTH STAGE OF GRIEF: QUESTIONING

When psychiatrist Elisabeth Kubler-Ross sought a way to understand the grief process, she famously came up with five stages: denial, anger, bargaining, depression and acceptance.

In the days since the Election Disaster of 2024, what’s emerged for me is a sense of hindsight. It’s not the “what if” phase of Kubler-Ross’ bargaining phase.

It’s more the wondering if certain events helped Trump win, were surmountable obstacles to his victory or didn’t matter as much as we thought they did.

I’ll give my ideas, but they certainly aren’t sure answers. Better political minds than mine, including yours, might have different thoughts about them.

But like the other stages of grief, we’re not going to get past this until we understand what happened and when it did.

So here are some things that happened – in no particular order – between November 7, 2020 – the day Joe Biden was declared the winner of that election – and November 3, 2024. There are probably others – if you think of some, I’m eager to see them.

1. THE HARRIS-TRUMP DEBATE

Kamala Harris wiped the floor with Trump in the CBS debate on September 10.

Don’t take my word for it. Polls conducted after the debate showed 60% or more of those watching believed Harris won that debate. She just seemed in control and, well, presidential – compared to his ranting about non-existent dog eating and telling us, after nine years, he had “concepts” of a plan to fix health care.

I don’t think it’s unreasonable to believe that after the debate, Harris and her supporters were absolutely convinced she couldn’t lose. How could anyone vote for that hot orange mess?

But polls show that most voters had made up their mind about who to vote for by Labor Day. That means the debate meant very little.

2. THE BIDEN-TRUMP DEBATE

How long into that debate did you watch until the sense of horror set in?

I think Biden has been a fantastic President – one of the two or three best of the 13 in my lifetime. Engineering the world’s strongest economic recovery from COVID, supporting Ukraine’s fight for survival, and just being decent and respectful.

But when he showed up at the CNN debate on June 27, he looked like an old man. He reminded many of us of our parents who suffered from dementia – the gaping mouth that indicates a blankness. On the other side, Trump was uncharacteristically restrained, letting Biden damage himself.

When that happened, some people wondered if there was some kind of coverup. Something similar to when Woodrow Wilson suffered a stroke in 1919, after which his wife and doctor virtually ran the country.

Was Biden president or was the country being run by his unelected advisers? And, if Biden wasn’t in charge, why weren’t the American people told?

3. BIDEN’S WITHDRAWAL

After the debate, actor George Clooney wrote a New York Times op-ed piece saying Biden couldn’t win re-election because of the way he’s aging. It was a tough piece from a Democratic Party stalwart and it shocked the faithful.

(An aside: Democrats should thank Clooney for being honest and having the party’s best interests at heart. I have no doubt today that Biden had no chance against Trump and that another nominee was the party’s only hope. That it didn’t work out is not Clooney’s fault.)

The withdrawal process was painful for all. But as even some of the non-Trump Republicans said, it showed that the Democrats weren’t a cult of personality and doing a responsible party needed to do.

 It took a month for Biden to see he couldn’t hold on. So he bowed out as gracefully – grace should be a part of his name – as he could.

Before he pulled out, there was speculation about what process Democrats would use to pick a replacement if he did. Biden eliminated that, fast – within an hour of his withdrawal statement, he endorsed his Vice President as his successor.

So here’s the question: Should Kamala Harris have become the nominee without any chance for those who voted for Biden in the primaries to have a say? 

I don’t know that there was a better process in late July. But maybe voters in November questioned why it came down the way it did.

4. AFGHANISTAN

The first thing that started to cut into Biden’s approval was the way the United States withdrew from Afghanistan in the summer of 2021.

The withdrawal was mandated by an agreement Trump signed with the Taliban providing for the removal of U.S. forces by May 1, 2021. When Biden took office, he agreed to honor the deal but to keep forces in the country until the end of September.

The Taliban wasn’t having it. Like the Vietnamese nearly a half-century earlier, they launched an offensive in July to take the country once and for all. The Afghan government collapsed like a cheap suit.

The withdrawal was chaotic. A suicide bomber killed 11 Marines trying to protect the Kabul airport and 170 civilians. Many of the people who had helped Americans during 20 years in the country were left behind. So was perhaps billions of dollars of U.S. taxpayer-funded military equipment.

It looked terrible. It was a black eye for the United States. Trump, who hamstrung Biden with the withdrawal agreement, joined the chorus of criticism.

The embarrassment might not have been forgotten three years later.

5. COVID

What people seemed to forget was the nightmare of the pandemic.

When more than a million people died in this country. When no one could leave their homes. When schools and businesses operated remotely. When social activities ground to a halt.

Trump mishandled – I would say criminally – COVID. Biden had to bring the country back from under its shroud. He aggressively pushed the rapidly developed vaccine (Trump likes to claim credit, but, really, did he have a choice?) and had to contend with antivax and antimasking campaigns.

COVID is still around, but it isn’t as scary as it was four years ago. It seems not to have been a factor at all in this election – and maybe that was a mistake by the Democrats not to mention how much less danger there is today.

6. HURRICANE LIES

Two very strange hurricanes beset the southeastern U.S. this fall. They didn’t approach from the usual direction, westward across the Atlantic. They moved east, through the Gulf of Mexico.

So North Carolina and Georgia got belted – not along the shore, but through the Appalachians – and in no way were they equipped for that.

That’s understandable, and maybe – with climate change worsening – Kansas and Colorado should think about hurricane prep in the future. 

But the impact was worsened by the lying from Republicans. Trump said the Biden administration and FEMA weren’t helping the area recover because it supported him. The party’s greater idiots argued that Democrats contrived to direct the storm the way it went.

Whether people accepted the lies and voted against Harris, costing her some key electoral votes, is something to think about.

7. ELON MUSK

He’s richer than God, even after his Twitter/X debacle.

Elon Musk is worth billions of dollars. And, in recent years, he seems to have become a little unhinged – complaining about birth rates, about “wokeness,” estranging himself from his transgender daughter.

A perfect match for Trump.

Was the money he spent and the effort he put into promoting Trump a big factor in the election? 

All I know is I won’t look at Teslas the same way again.

8. ROBERT F. KENNEDY JR.

Speaking of nutcases, meet Robert Francis Kennedy, Jr.

The son of a revered liberal icon and the nephew of two others started becoming a thing when he campaigned against vaccines. He’s a former environmental advocate also seems to have some weird encounters with animals – look up “Central Park bear dump” and “brainworm.”

Kennedy started the year running against Biden for the Democratic nomination. Then he switched to a third-party run and, when that looked like it might peter out, chose to endorse Trump – the antithesis of everything the Kennedy family has stood for politically since JFK.

By removing his name from most state ballots, he no longer stood as an alternative to Trump for people who wanted to reject both parties. So the only choice they had if they didn’t want either was not to vote – many of them may have taken that option. 

And once RFK Jr. endorsed Trump, enough of his small band of voters might have put him “over the top” – an appropriate term to use regarding RFK Jr.

9. STAR POWER

Trump had Kid Rock and Dean Cain. Harris had just about everyone else of acclaim.

From the sports world: Lebron James and Steph Curry. From the screen: Juiia Roberts, Viola Davis and Harrison Ford. From music: The Boss, Queen Bey, Tay Tay and JLo. 

As a result, Harris drew phenomenal crowds. Trump’s crowds diminished after hearing him speak for hours at a time. 

This all translated to Harris supporters and even some neutral observers to the idea that her campaign had momentum heading to the end.

But it might be possible that the celebrity endorsements had the opposite effect. Maybe they told people that these elitists in Hollywood and New York were looking to protect the status quo – and they voted the other way.

10. THE MSG RALLY

Conventional wisdom predicted the Madison Square Garden rally nine days before the election would be the final nail in Trump’s coffin. 

Especially after self-proclaimed comedian Tony Hinchcliff called Puerto Rico “an island of garbage.”

There were “jokes” about Black people, Jews and Muslims.

Former Obama adviser David Axelrod said afterward that the Puerto Rico comment might turn out to be the costliest joke in history.

Nope. 

11. IMMIGRATION

We are about to find out how serious people are about fixing immigration.

For years, Republicans and their allies in right-wing media have persisted in painting this menace of millions of people crossing the southern border illegally. For them, only draconian solutions exist: mass deportation and a wall.

Democrats believe such solutions are cruel – and unnecessarily insult Hispanic Americans who are already in this country.

Except that Hispanic Americans – particularly those who live close to the border, appear to have increased their support for Trump – despite the fact that he engineered the death of a bipartisan compromise bill for immigration reform. A bill that seemed like a sensible way to get this issue removed from the nation’s agenda.

Again, nope. If immigration was a key issue in this election, it favored Trump.

12. INFLATION

This seems to be the issue that might have had the most impact.

It’s strange how inflation works in politics. When prices go up faster, it scares people – especially those of us who live on a fixed income. I get that.

But what I don’t expect – but apparently others do – is that, when the inflation is controlled by the Fed raising interest rates, the prices that went up will go back to where they were. 

The price of a dozen eggs was 98 cents in 2000. In 2024, it’s $3. If eggs went back down to $1.50, which was what it was when the most recent inflation wave started, they will still be 50% higher than 20 years earlier.

In other words, price rises don’t go away. For anything. New cars once cost $400. Now they cost 100 times that. And that seems to scar Americans.

Inflation was inevitable after Trump’s mishandling of COVID, which caused supply disruptions throughout the world. That Biden and Harris get blamed for it, despite a remarkable effort to tame it, is ironic – and unfortunate.

13. GAZA

There seem to be two things Hamas and Benjamin Netanyahu have in common: They don’t want a two-state to resolve 76 years of conflict between Israel and Palestine – and they do want Donald Trump to be President of the United States.

The current crisis started 13 months ago when Hamas terrorists kidnapped and killed scores of Israeli civilians in a brazen attack. The Israeli military responded with almost total war, killing scores of Palestinian civilians. The Gaza Strip is a sad, bloody, destroyed mess.

Biden – and his vice president – were stuck. It’s long-standing American policy to defend Israel. But when Netanyahu overstepped the line into brutality, it was hard for the U.S. to pressure him otherwise. And neither side seemed to want any form of cease-fire.

All this magically benefitted Trump, who also doesn’t think a two-state solution is in his best interest. All this weakened Harris among conservative Jewish voters and among Arab-Americans. 

Not sure it cost her the election. But it didn’t help.

14. BUTLER

When I see that 80% of American voters made up their mind about the election before Labor Day, I have to think about the attempted assassination in Butler, Pennsylvania.

That happened on July 13. The gunman’s bullet or a fragment of it grazed Trump’s ear, causing him to bleed. Secret Service agents knocked him to the ground but, when the shooting stopped, got him back up. He walked away.

Did the fact that he walked away demonstrate some sort of manliness that appealed to voters. Did the shooting garner sympathy for Trump?

The fact that the Secret Service – a part of the Biden administration – appears to have bungled the incident didn’t help. Even if Harris and Biden had no control over it. 

Because, perhaps, in some voters’ eyes, they did.

15. CONVICTION AND PROSECUTION

Donald Trump is the first convicted felon ever elected President of the United States.

Let that sentence burnish in your eyes for a moment.

He was convicted by a jury of his peers of all – ALL – 34 counts of fraud regarding his hush money payment to Stormy Daniels in 2016. 

That’s not to mention federal court indictments for attempting to overturn the 2020 election results and mishandling classified documents, and a Fulton County, Georgia, indictment to interfering in the 2020 vote count. Prosecutorial mistakes, a Trump-appointed judge doing his bidding and the fact justice grinds slowly no matter what the crime have kept those matters from being adjudicated.

There are thousands of men and women in prisons across the country who wish people view their criminal history the way they view Trump’s.

But maybe, if you’re a celebrity, they let you do it. Or at least voters might feel that way.

Because the convictions and indictments rolled off their backs. Hell, his lament that he’s being persecuted might have actually helped him.

It’s disgusting. And it’s something to think about.

16. HER

Finally – and I’m sorry this took so long – there’s one factor to consider that seems as though it’s grossly unfair. It’s the topic of animated discussion in my household.

For consideration: The United States is not ready for a female President.

I don’t believe that. Or I didn’t believe that.

We’re supposed to be a society that functions on merit, not biology. My daughter and I watched “The West Wing” with the idea that, if she wanted, she could be President (Actually, what she wanted was to write a TV show like “The West Wing,” which is great, too).

My wife says we’re not ready to accept the idea of a woman President. Not that there shouldn’t be one – she knows there are lots of qualified women. 

It’s that we – men and women – can’t handle the idea.

Then throw in the fact that not only is Kamala Harris a woman, she’s also Black and of South Asian heritage.

Somehow, a Black man slipped into the White House in the midst of the worst financial crisis since the Depression. A lot of people never got over that. To my wife, another person of color in the Oval Office would have broken what exists of their brains.

——

So I spent my day writing this magnum opus about why. Why did Tuesday happen? How did Tuesday happen?

I’d love to hear your ideas about this. Is it any one of the questions, multiple questions or all of the above?

The question thing is going to be the stage of grief that lingers. But until we get past it, we can’t get over it – and we can’t begin to do what it takes to get Trump out of our lives.

Standard
Uncategorized

I SHOULD HAVE KNOWN BETTER

It was an incident after one of my happiest moments of 2024 – and it served as a warning that I didn’t see until now.

The New York Mets had just won the National League Division Series against the Philadelphia Phillies last month. Euphoric fans – including me – jammed the platform for the No. 7 train to Manhattan.

It originated at Main Street in Flushing and there were passengers aboard before the Citi Field stop. As joyous fans jammed the train, a young Hispanic man was standing by the opposite door.

He could tell the fans were happy, so he shouted “Let’s go Mets!” Which I thought was cute.

But for some reason that I’ve thought about since that moment, he shouted “Let’s go Donald Trump!”

Why the hell he would shout that-  at that moment – bewildered me. Not enough, however, to stop me from shouting back “Fuck Donald Trump!” – language I don’t use in public. (Although I suspect I’ll be using it more for awhile.)

What was going through his mind that he would shout his support of Trump in as unsuitable a moment as that?

Tonight, I found out. According to CNN’s exit polling, Latino men voted for Trump more than ever before – in some states, a majority of them voted for a guy who has belittled or diminished Hispanic Americans for decades. 

It’s amazing. He was first elected because of his racism toward Mexicans and Central Americans. And now some of those people are sending him back to the White House.

Why? 

Is it the phony toughness he projects? Like those wrestlers he admires and who seem to support him en masse. 

Were they suckered by “The Apprentice” into thinking that a guy who has claimed bankruptcy four times actually knows what it takes to make them more financially secure?

Can it be that they associate with his outlaw status? That they think he’s been railroaded they way some of them perceive themselves to be?

Do they, like some spoiled-brat white folks, believe there are people getting “free stuff” that they’re not getting- and either they want some, too, or no one should have whatever that stuff is?

And is the idea that a woman – and it doesn’t matter if she’s white or Black and South Asian – could be the most powerful person in the world so threatening and offensive to them that they’d put an incompetent male in the White House instead? Twice!

I’m angry and sad in a way I haven’t been in eight years. And what makes me most sad is seeing people voting against their own interest, taken in by a conman who is now going to avoid prison by claiming he’s above the law.

Or worse, that he is the law.

I do not pretend to understand why anyone sees a hero in Trump. There is nothing admirable or compassionate about him. He has no respect for people other than himself and anyone who can help enrich him.

It’s bewildering that anyone thinks the guy whose pathetic mishandling of the COVID crisis contributed to the inflation endured between 2021 and 2023 is the guy to bring down the price of eggs.

And because he respects tyrants, this is a moment of triumph from a diverse set of the world’s rogues – from Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinpeng to Benjamin Netanyahu and Viktor Orban.

I suppose the people who voted for Trump would say I’m being paternalistic – that they can look out for their own self-interest without my help. 

Kamala Harris ran as good a campaign as I’ve seen in my lifetime – and she will have nothing to show for it. I’m certain that a key factor in her defeat is that, well, she’s a she. And that she’s also a Black she and a South Asian she.

But the loser in a democratic election concedes. With the grace that Trump refused to give Joe Biden four years ago.

I just hope she doesn’t congratulate him. He doesn’t deserve it. Neither do the people who voted for him. 

As I said at a moment when some jerk zapped my joy of a Met win, “Fuck Donald Trump!”

about:blank
Standard
Uncategorized

TURN THAT DIAL

Because it evades my understanding, I’ve tried to imagine why anyone supports Donald Trump.

When he first announced his candidacy for President, back in 2015, I thought it was a joke. I brazenly told my brother that he’d lose all 50 states if he was the Republican nominee.

One reason for my stance was that Trump was a walking punchline in New York. His braggadocio wore thin when he filed for bankruptcy umpteen times. He was obviously not the business genius he claimed to be. 

But I should have gotten a hint when I went to a party and people were raving about “The Apprentice.” It gave him an image of strength and savvy that was, like everything else in his life, a fraud.

He built a following. Republican politicians didn’t take him seriously. Democrats didn’t take him seriously.

Nine years later, he’s still here. His sense of grievance struck a chord with millions of Americans. And, despite botching COVID, leading an attempted coup and being convicted on 34 counts of fraud, he stands a decent chance of becoming our 47th President.

Why? What’s the appeal?

TV. 

My generation – the baby boomers – are the first people to have grown up in a completely televised age. 

My parents used to talk about listening to Jack Benny and Bob Hope on the radio. That didn’t happen for us. We watched everything – I’m old enough to remember black-and-white – every night. 

And it was simple. There were three major networks. If you lived in a big city like New York, there were a couple of independent channels. There was no concept of the choices we face today.

So the TV you watched was pretty streamlined in the values and concepts it conveyed. Crime shows depicted a dangerous world that could only be preserved by steadfast law enforcers. Westerns showed the power of the good gunman. Game shows gave away dreamy prizes. All the people in sitcoms lived in houses that were much nicer than yours.

It was an aspirational world. And I think maybe my generation – and the generations that have followed – thought that. I can be a civilian and stop a criminal mastermind. I can be a factory worker and still have a 4-bedroom home. I can ride a horse into the sunset.

When our lives didn’t measure up to the ones we saw, it frustrated us. It’s not that easy to be Perry Mason or Dr. Kildare or Joe Friday. 

I think maybe Trump’s appeal is to that frustration that we didn’t get the lives we fantasized on TV. And if we did – if we did get the McMansion in Bergen County or the beach house in Hyannis – we know there are people out there who want it, too. 

And for both groups, there’s the perception that there are people who are newcomers or just different from us who are getting something for free – getting to that dream life we want – without the travail we endure.

When Trump talks about making America great again, he’s talking about that romanticized view of America and the disillusion that’s spreading from the boomers to those younger – and even to some who are not white, because they sense that they’re getting shut out, too.

Over the past days, I’ve tried to share my thoughts about Kamala Harris’ policies, particularly ones I believe show her aptitude and understanding of what America’s problems really are. They’re not magic cures. But they are ways to move the country forward.

She hasn’t been able to get her ideas heard because her opponent’s best chance is to manifest grievance. 

It’s cynical and sad. Giving Trump another chance will tear us apart. It will end with the demise of American greatness and consequences that are almost unimaginable.

There is no alternative to Kamala Harris and Tim Walz. In the next few days, we’ll find out if we’ll make it.

Standard
Uncategorized

THE UNSOLVABLE SOLVABLE PROBLEM

Let me throw this out there: The immigration “crisis” is hardly that.

This is a solvable problem. It is one for which Americans should relatively easily find common ground.

If that sounds crazy to you, after the past 20 years of xenophobia and jingoism, do a reality check. Because this is the reality:

— Yes, there are lots of people trying to get into the United States through its southern border. Most of them are desperate to escape poverty and violence – in Central America, in the Caribbean, and even in Asia and Africa.

— Many of these people are taking jobs in the United States. But whether they’re taking jobs away from Americans is highly doubtful. Most undocumented immigrants find work doing stuff that folks born here aren’t interested in doing: mowing lawns, picking crops, working in slaughterhouses and on mindless assembly line jobs.

— The trafficking of these people is a humanitarian nightmare. They are put in compromising positions by criminal gangs, extorted and exploited. 

— The borders do seem like a way for terrorists to penetrate our country – a country whose older citizens still hold dark memories of September 11, 2001. Not that the people who perpetrated that attack snuck in to the United States – the Al-Qaeda gang came here legally. But it’s understandable that people want vigilance on this matter.

There are multiple issues that concern liberals and conservatives. Republicans and Democrats. Responsible people in all 50 states.

But solving a problem means you can’t exploit it. And there seem to be a whole lot of people, mostly on the right, who much prefer making hay on an issue than eliminating or mitigating it.

Democrats and Republicans reached compromise on a bill earlier this year that would have addressed concerns on both sides. Increased security staffing. Guideposts for determining who should stay and who is too dangerous to stay. Fairness and humanity for families. A path to citizenship for those who are here without documentation.

It’s not as easy to scare people when you solve a problem. And that problem can’t be used as your gateway to exploit other issues.

I firmly a President Kamala Harris will not rest until she has some kind of deal that defuses and diminishes immigration as a flashpoint in American life. It would be her signature accomplishment if she succeeds. And with so many conservative Republicans signing on to her campaign, the opportunity to end the constant harping about this issue might never be more readily available.

Because otherwise, we’re going to hear about “caravans” every time wants to stymy a Democratic initiative. We’re going to hear about “broken borders” and “mules” and all the other crap.

Solve the damn problem. Show the world why America is so great,

Standard
Uncategorized

HOLDING THE COURSE IN CHOPPY SEAS

If you have a casual familiarity with world history, you know that empire building is a key part of it. The Egyptians, the Greeks, the Romans, the Ottomans, the British.

And now us. Like it or not – and, trust me, a lot of people don’t – the United States is the world’s most powerful nation. It has a fearsome military force, has its thumb on just about everybody’s economy and is the cultural touchstone of the planet.

It’s a privilege and a burden. The world’s lesser powers will either accept American leadership or see it as something to throw rocks at. 

Vladimir Putin, Xi Jinping, Kim Jong-Un, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. All of them can’t stand the idea that the United States stands in the way of their designs for dominance. At the same time, responsible leaders around the world seek our help in securing their way of life amid peace and prosperity.

No one seems to have understood this better than the 46th President of the United States: Joseph R. Biden, Jr.

Biden has always had a feel for global matters. He’s sought alliances and been a good partner throughout the world. He has led without dominating and reaffirmed American friendship.

He’s also stood up for what’s right.

Ukraine is the best example. Putin wanted this democracy nowhere near his turf. He did everything he could to undermine it. When it didn’t work – and the Ukrainians elected a comedian who turned out to be a real world leader – Putin launched a hideous war against people who just wanted to be left alone.

That Ukraine stands independent today – in what seemed like a considerable overmatch – is largely because of Volodymyr Zelinskyy’s leadership and the grit of its people. It also has a lot to do with Biden, the United States and the coalition of democratic powers that banded to give Ukraine the resources it needed to fight.

The situation in Gaza is a bit more complicated.

The United States has a long-standing and honorable commitment to the security of Israel. We recognized its independence in 1948 within minutes of its declaration. There are ancestral, social, economic and religious ties with the nation.

When Hamas launched the horrific terrorist attack on October 7 of last year, the Biden administration was obligated and inclined to support the Israelis. It has, for the most part, kept that commitment.

It’s kept that despite the fact that Israel’s leader, Benjamin Netanyahu, is probably more spiritually aligned with Putin than Biden. Keeping a nation at war – and putting the burden on non-combatants – is an evil in itself. What Netanyahu has done in Gaza is unforgivable.

Biden has needed to balance all his responsibilities in this crisis. And very few in the United States were going to be happy with whatever he did. That he owned up to the responsibility is a credit to his administration – amazingly, this crisis would be worse if he weren’t president.

It is hoped that Kamala Harris, who didn’t have particular international experience when she became vice president, has learned from Biden. And, because she’s learned for the professionals in this administration, she can be counted on to guide American foreign policy in a moral and protective direction.

She’ll have some freedom to change up a few things – dealing with Netanyahu, who is trying to stay one step ahead of the law in Israel. But she’s clear about her unbridled support for Zelinskyy and Ukraine, and will deal with bad actors directly and firmly.

What she won’t do is back down from American responsibility. She will not threaten NATO, or our partners in East Asia. She won’t talk tough about China before caving like a sandcastle in a tsunami. She’ll deal firmly and fairly with crises throughout the world.

She will not isolate us. She won’t bend under the weight of the power we wield on this planet and beyond.

You can’t say that about her opposition.

Standard
Uncategorized

IT’S A TRIP

Communication technology has radically changed in my lifetime – think cellphones, 84-inch TV screens, the whole freakin’ Internet.

But we’re pretty much using the same transportation technology that existed since before I was born.

I don’t imagine a President Kamala Harris is going to be as bold as to push for magnetic levitation, vacuum or anything else short of the impossible (see: “Star Trek,” transporter). So I’ll settle for improving and rebuilding our systems of getting places – and that’s a commitment that will be more of a continuation than a change.

President Biden should go down in history for what’s he captained in terms of infrastructure. It might be frustrating to get stuck in traffic caused by the umpteen highway improvement projects around the country. 

But making these roads safer and more efficient is a job that’s long overdue – and Biden did all this while boosting employment and, yes, keeping the inflation inherent in such an expansion in check. (Yes, we had inflation problems, but those were more about supply chain shortfalls caused by the pandemic.)

Improving highways isn’t the best way to meet our nation’s transportation needs. The idea is to get more people out of cars rather than into them in order to combat climate change and move people more efficiently. But that will take time.

Fortunately, the Biden-Harris administration has been clear-minded about pushing for alternative fuel – particularly, electric – vehicles. And it’s making a difference – there are lots more hybrid and electric vehicles on the road. People are starting to realize how much better life can be when you don’t need to unburden yourself of $40 or $50 to fill a gas tank each week.

Harris wants to expand the network of charging stations so that you’re never more than a few miles away from one. Her administration would also need to push automakers to improve battery life and length – long-distance trips are still a problem because of limited vehicle range.

Biden’s being a train freak has been a boon for public transportation. Improvements in intercity rail and commuter lines were prioritized – New York and New Jersey are finally building a new tunnel to replace century-old infrastructure under the Hudson River.

Now it’s time to expand. Europe and East Asia thrive on high-speed rail. There’s no reason the United States can’t. If it took less than five hours to from midtown New York to downtown Chicago by train, wouldn’t you rather take that than schlep to LaGuardia, wait for a 2-hour flight, then schlep from O’Hare to the Loop.

Secretary Pete Buttigieg – whose high profile has been a reassuring sign that Biden and Harris took transportation seriously – has pushed for an expansion of high-speed rail projects across the country. It’s going to take a while to build them – probably beyond the lifetime of many of us.

But let’s at least start.

One other transportation thought.

This summer, New York was on the verge of a bold experiment, the kind that doesn’t happen often in this country. Like several other cities around the world – London, in particular – New York was going to initiate congestion pricing – making drivers pay a toll to enter midtown and lower Manhattan.

The idea would be to unclog the narrow streets of the nation’s largest city, making it easier for vehicles that absolutely need to get around. Nothing terrifies me quite like seeing an ambulance stuck in gridlock on an impassable side street – imagine the poor person fighting for his or her life inside.

People who live in the suburbs squawked. How dare New York charge us extra to bring our pickups and SUVs into town? (Forgetting how they bar non-residents from using their parks and pools.) So the state’s governor, Kathy Hochul, caved and put off the plan’s implementation.

Should Harris win the White House, she should push to get the experiment started. And she should also, after making sure officials keep their promise to fund mass transit with the revenue from the program, pump federal money into the city to help improve the subways and buses.

Getting people from here to there – safely, quickly and cleanly – appears to be a goal of the Harris-Walz campaign. And let’s face it, it’s the only campaign thinking about something that serious.

Standard
Uncategorized

OLDEN DAYS

Whenever one of my contemporaries complains about the problems of getting older, my kneejerk response is “It’s better than the alternative.”

But sometimes I wonder.

Families go through hell when a parent or grandparent requires more than just routine care. In particular, dementia takes an incredible toll on a family’s psychology and finances.

There’s nothing federal or state governments can do to make the emotional pain of watching a loved one diminish. But anything that can be done to lessen the financial burden will help families deal with the heartbreak.

Earlier this month, Kamala Harris proposed allowing Medicare to help pay the costs of elderly home care. She says her administration would pay for this through some of the savings achieved through negotiating drug prices.

It’s an idea and seems worth trying. 

The details would be interesting. Would Medicare establish floors and ceilings for what care providers could receive as part of the reimbursement? Would there be minimum standards for quality?

Right now, finding people to attend to an elder in your care is crazy – at least here in New York. There are agencies and contractors, and they try to place people who might not be especially qualified for the task.

And there are all kinds of other issues. Are families in compliance with IRS regulations concerning taxes? Are the care providers in the country legally, or are they undocumented? How much of a family’s fortune needs to be spent before it qualifies for other forms of assistance, such as Medicaid?

As part of her plans for families caring for elderly members, Harris wants to end the practice of allowing the seizure of deceased recipients’ homes to help allay the costs of care. That is certainly a good thing.

Harris says she’s made these proposals after thinking about the difficulties she had when her mother was dying of breast cancer. That’s something Americans can relate to – when we talk about “economic anxiety,” that – and not some blatantly racist trope – is what we should mean.

The other key issue affecting those who are is the protection of Social Security and Medicare.

Republicans hate those two programs. They are what endear so many Americans to the Democratic Party – gifts from Franklin Roosevelt and Lyndon Johnson to this generation and beyond.

Because the population is aging, the costs of these programs are taxing the systems that support them. This has given opponents an opening. For instance, they believe letting Social Security become a voucher program that allows funds to be invested as recipients see fit would help.

Which it wouldn’t. Especially now, at the point of our lives when Social Security is a crucial part of our income. It would be like gambling. And one mistake could be life-changing – and threatening.

Harris is looking at a longstanding Democratic idea – raising the ceiling at which income is taxed for Social Security and Medicare purposes. It’s ridiculous that Elon Musk pays a lower percentage of his income toward these programs – which he doesn’t need – than a teacher, a policeman or a miner.

But, as befits the point of these pieces, it’s not something you hear a lot about in the campaign coverage. Because the idea is to not let this message get heard – for fear it’s really popular among the demographic that could ensure her election.

It matters to my generation. It matters to my kids. I’ll bet it matters to you. 

In more ways than one, that beats the alternative.

Standard
Uncategorized

OUR HOUSE

The distraction strategy aimed at stopping Kamala Harris is most effective at drowning out her solid, commonsense ideas for solving a real crisis in America: housing.

This problem especially hurts young adults starting out in the workplace. It’s hard to take a job that would advance your career but doesn’t pay enough to cover the rent or the mortgage payment for a home.

But this issue spans generations. Many of my fellow retirees are looking to downsize or move to a place that’s more accessible to folks our age. That’s not an easy thing to find.

Just before the Democratic convention in August, Harris and newly picked running mate Tim Walz announced their housing plan. It is multi-faceted and seems pretty damn smart.

Among her proposals is an initiative to build 3 million new housing units. It would rely on providing incentives to homebuilders, including breaks when those new homes go to first-time buyers.

Harris and Walz also want to provide a $25,000 credit to first-time homebuyers. They want to crack down on housing industry manipulation – both in the purchasing of groups of homes as an investment rather than a life experience, and in the manipulation of rental markets aimed at driving up lease costs.

Many of their proposals have bipartisan support – if you remember that idea. Kids of Republicans who aren’t super wealthy need homes, too.

One thing I think a Harris-Walz administration should consider is a reallocation of real estate space.

You see it almost everywhere you go: Big office buildings emptied by COVID and teleworking. Storefronts, strip shopping centers and malls deserted thanks to the convenience of online shopping.

There is so much empty built-up space in this country. It’s not limited to cities  – like what I’ve seen first-hand in San Francisco and Minneapolis. In suburban New York, where I live, nothing looks as awful as a space that was once occupied by workers or shoppers.

Converting these spaces is going to take a lot of money. Think about it: Most offices don’t have water flowing through them – and people aren’t going to want apartments for which you share a bathroom and kitchen with your neighbors. Pipes ain’t cheap.

But sometimes we forget that we’re a country that’s especially good at solving problems. 

The technology Americans created is what makes it possible for everyone in the world to see what I’m writing right now. We can see a co-worker in Istanbul, buy a hat from a store in Seoul or order jambalaya from New Orleans.

The scene from “Apollo 13” when the NASA scientists create a way to reduce CO2 emissions using the available parts on the spacecraft should be our guide in endeavors like this – including and especially in something so precious as housing.

Because one of the reasons we’re seeing the declines in family creation that conservatives seem so worked up about is that young people have such a hard time figuring out how to make a go of it.

Solving a housing crisis won’t cause any massive shift. But it sure will help.

One final point: Homelessness remains a scourge in this country. It’s an embarrassment and a tragedy in the world’s No. 1 economy.

And while all of it is awful, the fact that people who have served the United States as members of the military find themselves on the streets or in the woods is shameful.

We’ve got the space. We need the know-how and the will.

That – not phony stories about people eating dogs and cats – is what American politics should be about.

Tomorrow, I’ll talk about the Harris-Walz campaign and elder care.

favorites://
Standard
Uncategorized

I’VE GOT ISSUES

This is, as you have heard more times that you ever wanted, the most consequential presidential election of our lifetime.

The consequences surpass those of the last presidential election in 2020. And, of course, that one had consequences exceeding the 2016 vote. Obviously, 2016 was more consequential than 2012 – which, now that I think about it, probably was the least consequential of the 21st century.

You get the idea.

The problem is that this, seriously, is a real test for our country. It’s about what kind of a nation we are – not what we imagine we are or wish we were. If we’re about governance and community, or grievance and dissolution.

Are we going able to look at ourselves on November 6 and shout hosannas about the beauty of democracy? Or are we going to decide that, yeah, this country is closed until further notice while we clean the place out?

Too much is written about this election already – and I’m somewhat sorry to add to the noise. The fact is I wanted to be more involved in this – I even signed up for a local congressional campaign.

But I admit I don’t have the patience to hear the other side on this. I’ve heard it already. 

I heard it in Citi Field one gray May afternoon when this couple – that was clearly, as my Dad used to say, in their cups – groused loudly about how all these people were getting free stuff thanks to “Clueless Joe” in the White House.

I see in signs on lawns around my neighborhood. “Democrats Support Iran,” “Democrats are Socialists,” “Trump Saved America.”

There are the shirts and signs that read something like “We like country music, the Lord’s Prayer, guns, the American flag and making liberals mad.” As if they like those things only because they hope it gets some people pissed.

I did text messages in 2020 and got the same sort of crap. 

Then there was whatever that was at Madison Square Garden yesterday. I don’t have to catalog the bigotry, the racism and the hatred spewed – you can read about if you haven’t already.

In fact, it took me to this point to tell you what I want to write about instead of that – and what I hope to write about in the run-up to Election Day.

Because, after thinking about it, I’ve got a theory about why this election is even close.

It has to do with a strategy that includes the venomfest that polluted midtown Manhattan. That display was not designed to convince anybody to vote for Donald Trump. 

It was designed to keep people talking about Donald Trump. Because when “Morning Joe” and “The View” and “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert” are talking about Trump and the asininity around him, they are not talking about what Kamala Harris would do if she was elected.

That is the point.

Michelle Obama raised a great point in her speech in Kalamazoo, Michigan, on Saturday: Harris is held to a much higher standard that Trump. It’s unfair. Or as Van Jones said, she needs to be flawless, while he can be lawless.

And the fact is that she meets that higher standard. Consistently. Constantly. With passion, with intelligence, with empathy and with joy.

You won’t know that. That won’t be the zeitgeist. Because the cacophony of Trumpania is designed to make sure you don’t.

It explains why people think she’s not specific about what she would do as President. Because no one can hear what she has to say when the national conversation is about who maligned Puerto Rico or Hannibal Lecter or eating dogs in Ohio.

Before Trump came along, seeking the presidency was about a vision. Even if you disagreed with it – I’m a lifelong Democrat and have never contemplated voting for a Republican, but I know John McCain and Mitt Romney had some sort of idea about moving America toward the future.

Trump doesn’t give a damn. As long as he panders to his base, he’ll say anything. Do you think he really cares one way or another about abortion? Or even how to build a national economy?

As long as people support him for giving them tax breaks and eroding women’s rights, he’s fine.

So what I want to talk about the next few days is the future. The place we’re all going for at least some of the way.

Because Kamala Harris has tried to campaign on what she’d do as the 47th President of the United States. And Donald Trump doesn’t want her to do that.

So we’ll talk about a few things that require our attention: housing, elder care, transportation, immigration, America’s role in the world, education and our politics.

Now that’s the kind of discussion I can look forward to.

Standard
Uncategorized

PARIS 2024 OR BERLIN 1936?

Wow, did you enjoy the Summer Olympics that ended Sunday night in Paris?

I sure did. I didn’t nearly as much as a lot of you, but I got caught up in a bunch of the sports – particularly 3-on-3 basketball, swimming and sport climbing. My son has climbed at gyms in South Korea and Brooklyn, and his interest sparked mine in an event that I found riveting.

What also made it fun was the setting. Paris, like London in 2012 and Barcelona in 1992, is a great setting for the Games. The events are intertwined with the culture and history. (It’s one of the reasons why the IOC should give Tokyo another shot after the last games were screwed by the pandemic.)

The French people seemed to relish being hosts. It was a chance to show off what’s best about their country. Admit it, you and whoever you hang with have talked about visiting France at least one in the past two and-a-half weeks.

Here’s one reason for that: For all the political and social problems facing the French, the country’s face at the Games was Emmanuel Macron.

The French president had official responsibilities, uttering the mandated short sentence that welcomes athletes. 

But he also had symbolic responsibility as France’s head cheerleader. He was there when swimmer Leon Marchand won his fourth gold medal. He whipped off his jacket amid the tension as the French women just missed topping the Americans for the basketball good.

The athletes felt comfortable in France – and that inspired some iconic performances. The French seemed happy to have them. Macron had a little to do with that.

You know there has to be a counterpoint. But I’ll bet it has crossed your mind.

Four paragraphs up, I mention the official responsibilities of a country’s head of state – opening the Games with just a prescribed sentence. No big speech. Just “I declare open the Games of Paris celebrating the 33rd Olympiad of the modern era.”

Well, the next Games – as that folderol with Tom Cruise demonstrated – are in Los Angeles in 2028. And the President of the United States is expected to be there, kicking off the kind of celebration that Californians hinted at in the Snoop Dogg, Billie Eilish and Red Hot Chili Peppers performances.

So, on November 5, as if there wasn’t enough to think about, there’s this: Who will open the Games of the 34th Olympiad? And how will he or she set the tone for athletes from around the world?

If it’s she, I don’t think we have a problem. Kamela Harris is a Californian. She’s cheered on many of these athletes before. It’s likely that many of the stars of these Games, like Steph Curry, will support her campaign.

And that would set a positive tone for athletes around the world, including those from countries at loggerheads in one way or another with the United States. It’ll make it easier for Los Angeles to be the kind of welcoming host it has been twice before. 

Then, of course, there’s Donald Trump.

Think about all the things you’ve watched in Paris. Then, instead of inserting Macron or Harris, you replace them with Trump.

A little dissonant, eh? 

Can you imagine Trump playing second fiddle to the athletes? Would his ego allow that? 

Would he tell the world that he’s a golf champion, even if it’s on his course and under his rules? Would he complain loudly if Russian athletes were barred from carrying their nation’s flag for its aggression against Ukraine – or would he even try to force the IOC to lift a ban and invite Putin to the opening ceremonies?

Would he block athletes from Iran and China from attending? Would he badger a judge in a subjective sport who scored a white American athlete lower than an Asian or Black athlete from the rest of the world?

Would many of the American athletes want nothing to do with him? Would he embarrass them in front of the world by complaining that they’re disrespectful to him?

Would the Opening Ceremony celebrate the diversity of the United States? Would it be forced to go through a screening process by the Project 2025 yahoos that eliminates anything varying from the right-wing narrative? Could conservative athletes feel free to carry Confederate flags into the L.A. Coliseum?

Would Trump, if he’s not given the deference he believes he’s entitled to, even suggest canceling the Games or blocking federal funds to help defray some of the costs for Los Angeles, a place that isn’t likely to vote for him in 2024?

All of that stuff sounds crazy. But again, we’re talking about a guy who claims his opponent used AI to conjure images of people showing up at a rally that was broadcast live.

Right now, the United States, France and the rest of the world are basking in the afterglow of a successful Olympics. It obviously won’t last forever, but it’s nice while it’s here.

What should scare us is feeling the way the world felt on August 17, 1936, the day after Adolf Hitler used the Berlin Olympics to celebrate his Nazi regime. When Jewish athletes were blocked from participating by countries besides Germany for fear on not offending the host.

How we feel on July 31, 2028 will depend a lot on what we do on November 5, 2024. It’s far from the most important reason to consider our choices carefully.

But today does feel good – and that’s a powerful thing.

Standard