Uncategorized

STEPHEN

IF you read this after 12:35 a.m. ET on Friday, May 22, “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert” is now just television history.

In fact, the Columbia Broadcasting System’s effort to come up with an entry for late-night TV is over. It began in the late 1960s, when the network realized that the old movies airing on its owned stations as “The Late Show” couldn’t match the juggernaut that was NBC “The Tonight Show.”

But both Merv Griffin and Pat “Wheel of Fortune” Sajak couldn’t puncture the market. It wasn’t until 1993, after Johnny Carson retired and Jay Leno succeeded him, that CBS went all-in. They brought in the man thought to be Carson’s heir apparent, David Letterman, and installed him in the 11:30 p.m. time slot.

It worked. Letterman and Leno slugged it out for ratings. Letterman was the more television-savvy guy, understanding that the key to late-night success was creating a buzz that had people staying up late so they could talk about it at work the next day.

Stupid Pet Tricks. Stupid Human Tricks. Larry “Bud” Melman. Hello, Delly. The Top 10 List.

Letterman revered Johnny Carson, who ultimately is the man responsible for late-night TV being an institution. He hosted “The Tonight Show” for more than 30 years. Letterman did his variations on Carson’s comedic touches for the show – such bits as Carnac the Magician and the Mighty Carson Art Players. 

So did Leno. But “The Tonight Show” is the New York Yankees of late-night television. It occasionally reaches for topical humor, but its bread-and-butter is the a-list and b-list stars who come on to promote a movie or TV series.

Carson was more into interviewing authors and politicians when he hosted the show from 30 Rockefeller Plaza in New York. When he moved “Tonight” to California in the 1960s, it became much more of an entertainment vehicle.

That was – and is – “Tonight”‘s legacy, and Leno was probably better suited to continue it than Letterman, who had hosted daytime and late-late-night shows on NBC. 

Freed from the “Tonight” constraints, Letterman appealed to a younger audience and his bits were positioned perfectly for the media change from over-the-air to online that mark the early 21st century. How many times have you watched Letterman and his guests as they come up randomly in the reels of your Facebook feed?

After 30 years, Letterman gave up his show, most likely because Stephen Colbert just finished his historic run on “The Colbert Report” and was out there waiting to be plucked.

Colbert gained some of his political sensibilities from working with Jon Stewart on “The Daily Show.” Those were heightened when Donald Trump – from all indications, diametrically opposite in personality and ethics from Colbert – rose to power in 2016.

Because Colbert and ABC’s Jimmy Kimmel are both on legacy networks, something Trump understands, they have been at each other from the beginning of the first term. When Trump regained the White House in the 2024 election, there’s little doubt Colbert and Kimmel were on some sort of hit list.

Trump failed with Kimmel. His sycophants tried to drive Kimmel off the air after he made a less-than-reverent remark about the murder of right-wing provocateur Charlie Kirk. The flap, which included remarks threatening ABC by tame FCC Chairman Brendan Carr, led to Disney suspending Kimmel’s show indefinitely.

Protests forced Disney to back down and Kimmel returned to the air.

But Trump likely succeeded with Colbert. CBS was taken over by Paramount under the aegis of David Ellison, the son of tech billionaire and general asshole Larry Ellison. His company, Skydance, now wants control of Warner Discovery, the parent of CNN, HBO and Warner Bros.

To get that approval, the Ellisons needed to make nice with Donnie Thinskin. And while Skydance claims “The Late Show” loses oodles of money, most people in the industry call BS.

Letterman, in a recent interview, said “I’m just going to go on record as saying: They’re lying. They’re lying weasels.”

My soft spot for Colbert goes beyond the fact that we share an alma mater and Northwesterners stick up for one another. He’s not only funny, he’s compassionate, animated and seemingly interested in everything.

More important, he, Kimmel, Stewart, Seth Meyers and John Oliver have done something that the other institutions that we counted on did not.

They stood up to Donald Trump.

The legacy news networks can’t say that. Even the cable networks – CNN and MS Now – can’t. Newspapers like The Washington Post and The Los Angeles Times can’t say that. Our universities, with few exceptions and including my alma mater, can’t say that.

But these comedians – and you can add Jimmy Fallon, who walks the NBC tightrope as well as he can – have taken the blows of Trump and his henchmen. Because they’re part of the megamedia, the odds are stacked against them.

They moved late-night television from pure entertainment to becoming the way a whole generation learns what’s going on in the world. They’re trusted more than Bari Weiss’ pet anchorman on CBS or the other non-entities on network news. And no one is taking seriously Fox’s late-night mess, Greg Gutfeld, who is to “comedy” as “poison ivy” is to “vegetable.”

Colbert never flinched. Neither has Kimmel, Meyers or Oliver. They’re out there to reflect the anger that has boiled over from the nonsense Trump has perpetrated since January 20, 2025 – and even those four years before the Biden Sanity Interlude.

— 

One final point: There’s a good chance you won’t see much of the Colbert archive starting now. The other side in this is petty. They control the rights to his material.. They can bury it – and I suspect that’s what they’re going to do.

So I hope you have some old tapes or Colbert files on your computer. That’s how you’ll remember his fantastic 11-year run on CBS – until his next act surfaces. 

Standard
Uncategorized

EYE, DON’T NEED IT

As far as I know, this is what’s on CBS:

— 10 sitcoms all based around some guy named Sheldon.

— A bunch of shows purporting to be about the FBI.

— A bunch of shows purporting to be about military investigators.

Right now, the only thing I ever watch that airs on CBS is “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert” – and I only watch the clips I see on social media.

But as we all know, that’s going to end. CBS announced that it is ending the entire “Late Show” franchise. The announcement says the economics of late night television led to the decision.

And we all know that’s crap. CBS ended the show because its parent company, Paramount, is being sold to Skydance, the pet project of the Ellison family. That $8 billion deal has to be approved by a Justice Department that insists on fealty to Donald Trump.

Fealty is not the way to describe Colbert’s attitude toward Trump. It’s more like middle-fingerty.

But let’s be fair. CBS has long stopped being the “Tiffany Network” of our youth. Is there any comedy on the network of the caliber of “The Mary Tyler Moore Show” or “All in the Family” or “M*A*S*H”? Is there any drama on CBS that reminds you of “Mission: Impossible”? Where are the “Young People’s Concerts” and “See It Now” and “The 20th Century” and “CBS Reports”?

Does CBS News carry the same cachet of the Murrow-Cronkite-Rather era? CBS paid $16 million to settle a suit from Trump that alleged “60 Minutes” doctored an interview with Kamala Harris – would the old CBS have caved like a sandcastle in a tidal wave?

It makes me wonder: Has the idea of television networks become obsolete?

In my younger days, networks were gathering places. News – local and global. Sports. Music. Ed Sullivan tried to entertain an entire nation in one hour. It might have been schlocky at times, but it was an effort to bring the nation together around a small screen.

Now they only seem interested in maximizing the cash generated for the least amount of effort. You used to look forward to the fall preview issue of TV Guide and the new shows on the networks. Is there still a TV Guide, much less a fall season?

Maybe it’s time to say goodbye to eyes and peacocks and whatever you call the ABC logo,

Maybe networks can be formed by confederations of artists: performers, writers, tradespeople, producers. First, teaming to create interesting new programming. 

Second, forming a link among the shows that give them a shared branding. Arista or Canelot or some other fantastic name that link news and programming of the highest quality at little or no cost to viewers.

It’s complicated, but it doesn’t seem impossible. It’s what over-the-air TV was, in a way, when people my age were born. 

Right now, with cable and streaming, we have more choices than ever before. But it never seems as though there’s anything GOOD on. Instead of another news panel on what goofy thing Trump said today, how about innovative investigative reports on health crises around the world, or medical breakthroughs, or re-examining historic events.

A TV confederation would need to find a way to make it economically feasible for the people working in it. That, not the technology, seems to me the biggest stumbling block. 

What’s going to keep legacy networks in business is the understandable argument that camerapeople and make up artists and actors need to feed their families. If you can make it so that so that people make decent livings without the infrastructure of networks and affiliates, it would make American media more immune to the kind of ridiculous pressure it faces from the Trump gang.

I don’t have a lot of answers. I’m not sure how this would work. But I’m sick of capitulation and mediocrity. 

Colbert’s cancellation isn’t the end of this – I would not bet money that he will still be on the air until his contract runs out next May. I think the Ellisons will unceremoniously end “The Late Show,” Jon Stewart and “The Daily Show” and anything resembling independent reporting at CBS News. 

It will be the watery pablum that CBS puts our every night.

It’s time to revolutionize American media. To think differently.

Standard